Posts made in October, 2017

Kindness As A Process Improvement

Posted by on Oct 19, 2017 in Business Operations, Continuous Improvement, Problem Solving, Project Management, Six Sigma | 0 comments

While perusing my LinkedIn account last week, I ran across an article in Business Insider that caught my eye. The author, Kate Taylor, discussed how Chick-fil-A is beating is the competition, not with technology or undercutting prices, but with simple acts of kindness. By teaching employees to use simple phrases like “please” and “thank you,” the company has developed a customer satisfaction rating that leads the food industry. This is somewhat counter-intuitive, as we often think that process improvements cost a great deal of money. Yet coaching staff to use certain phrases that address customer expectations is probably one of the least expensive and most cost-efficient ways one can use to improve customer satisfaction. A good way to evaluate factors for customer satisfaction is the Kano model, developed by Dr. Noriaki Kano. It involves multiple customer need levels, including an expected and/or base quality, a normal quality, and a high or exciting quality. In the expected quality category, one would include standard items such as a bed in a hotel room, or chairs in a waiting room. Normal qualifiers could be items that satisfied basic needs or basic requirements, such as three bedrooms in a new home. If a couple with two kids found a home with three bedrooms, then they would likely be satisfied because it meets their basic expectations. The real goal is to obtain those factors that are considered exciting qualities or “delighters.” These are things that, while not an expectation of the customer, are actually above and beyond the expectation. For me, an example of this is receiving warm cookies when checking into a hotel room. After driving all day and being hungry and tired upon arrival, who knew what a satisfier a sweet treat could be! The Kano model is good for helping to demonstrate what a company must provide for its customers, what it should provide, and those factors that will excite or “wow” a customer — those things that are unexpected, but very much appreciated. The next time you end a conversation with your customer, perhaps instead of using “thank you,” try Chick-fil-A’s approach and use, “My pleasure. I hope to see you again soon.” Let me know how it goes! How are you helping your employees to work smarter by reducing the amount of time they spend on non-productive activities and correcting errors? If your business processes need a “check-up,” please email me at michael@leadingchangeforgood.com! I’d love to help you get back to a healthy, productive...

Read More

Using Process Improvement to End Homelessness

Posted by on Oct 12, 2017 in Business Operations, Continuous Improvement, Non-Profits, Problem Solving, Project Management, Six Sigma | 0 comments

Homelessness is an issue that pervades many societies around the world, but it seems to be an exceptional struggle for the United States. It’s a complex problem that leads many to conclude that the homeless will always be a part of today’s urban environment. However, an organization called Community Solutions believes that homelessness is truly a solvable problem. It’s just an issue that’s lost its sense of urgency. By utilizing data, Community Solutions is helping communities combat homelessness real time, by tracking progress against monthly goals, and accelerating the spread of proven strategies. Through an initiative called Built for Zero, they’re creating systems that are built for learning, allowing organizers to change and improve as they go, prioritize resources, identify gaps and match people to the best housing opportunities to fit their needs. And, it seems to be working. In January, The City of Rockford, Illinois Department of Human Services announced that the City has been recognized as the first community participating in Built for Zero to effectively end homelessness among local veterans. Using data for improvement isn’t only about having the correct numbers and facts – it’s about using them for decision-making – to make adjustments, refine systems and track progress in real time. This isn’t a new or revolutionary approach. In fact, most operations and business excellence problem solvers across industries already make daily improvements and adjustments that are centered on data analysis. It is unusual, though, to see it applied to improving the well-being of a community. In the case of Built for Zero, data analysis has enabled evaluation, troubleshooting and process improvement across a community’s entire housing placement system, helping communities prioritize resources, identify gaps and ensure that individuals and families experiencing homelessness are referred to housing opportunities that best fit their needs. In the past, cities have not kept track of housing placement data on a community level. Individual agencies may collect data on the number of clients it houses in a week or a month, but odds are that data isn’t relayed across the system. Without this data, community leaders have know way of knowing if progress is being made. In theory, fixing the problem is simple. In order for a community to end homelessness, the total number of people it places into housing each month should be greater than or equal to the number of people it needs to house that month to achieve a path to zero. If those numbers are out of whack, then it’s easy to tell that a community needs to adjust its strategy. That’s where an openness for data collaboration comes in. Participating communities are publicly sharing their monthly housing placement measurements, allowing community leaders, partners and stakeholders to track progress in real time. This transparent feedback loop not only allows a community to constantly evaluate and enhance its system, it also creates shared accountability and buy-in across the entire housing placement system and encourages learning and communication across communities within the initiative. It is this type of transparent, real-time, person-specific data that will help communities optimize resources, improve multi-agency coordination and accelerate housing placements, ultimately bringing the goal of ending veteran and chronic homelessness nationwide over the next few years within reach. What other societal issues do you think could be helped by process improvement? Please share your ideas! How are you helping your employees to work smarter by reducing the amount of time they spend on non-productive activities and correcting errors? If your business processes need a “check-up,” please email me at michael@leadingchangeforgood.com! I’d love to help you get back to a healthy, productive...

Read More

An Rx from Pharma: Quality by Design

Posted by on Oct 5, 2017 in Business Operations, Continuous Improvement, Health Care, Pharma, Problem Solving, Project Management, Six Sigma | 0 comments

Several years ago, I spent a summer working for a company that manufactured communication antennas. I can still remember the quality control analyst coming by, twice a day, with a grocery cart full of parts that had been rejected for not meeting tolerance standards. I was amazed at the amount of work that went into creating these parts, just to have such a large volume returned because they did not meet quality standards. What a waste! The main problem with late-stage quality analysis is that it only detects and gets rid of substandard products or parts—it doesn’t prevent them from being created in the first place. As manufacturing has evolved over the years, companies have put in place a variety of techniques to evaluate quality more rigorously, and in many cases, to embed quality control throughout the manufacturing process. In a recent article in Pharmaceutical Technology, Hermes Pharma‘s Analytical Development Senior Manager Martin Koeberle, Ph.D. and QbD & Drug Regulatory Affairs Senior Manager Wolfgang Schiemenz discuss the use of quality by design in pharmaceutical manufacturing. By utilizing quality by design techniques, pharmaceutical companies like Hermes Pharma are able to determine critical quality attributes (CQAs) that may significantly affect the quality of their final product. By honing in on these CQAs in advance, the team can identify the key variables that affect the production process, or critical process parameters (CPPs). These can be actively monitored to avoid any deviation in the manufacturing process, ensuring product quality and that CQAs are met. Techniques such as this also may enable the company to simplify regulatory compliance. By making early adjustments to the manufacturing process, they can avoid costly late-stage adjustments that have to be formally registered with regulatory bodies after large scale production has begun. As pharmaceuticals become increasingly complex to manufacture, it’s more important than ever that quality is designed into the them from the beginning to ensure patient safety. And ultimately, to deliver a better product that improves lives and better patient outcomes. If you haven’t checked out the article, it’s worth the read. The lessons learned can be applied across many industries that are working to boost production output, reduce throughput times, lower costs, and deliver an amazing products that meet the needs of customers. How are you helping your employees to work smarter by reducing the amount of time they spend on non-productive activities and correcting errors? If your business processes need a “check-up,” please email me at michael@leadingchangeforgood.com! I’d love to help you get back to a healthy, productive...

Read More